Name: McNair International - International Arbitration Law Firm
Address: 5th Floor, Tatweer Tower,, Diplomatic Area, West Bay,, Doha, PO Box 23939
Telephone: +974 4491 1404

Publications Search

To search the McNair International database for publications falling under a particular category, please use the search form below.

Click to select a search category

Latest Publications

US withdraws from Iran deal

...

5 June 2018

International lawPublic international lawSanctions

Case Update - Judicial/Arbitrator bias and conflicts of interest

...

27 May 2018

Commercial arbitrationCommercial litigationEnglish lawInvestment treaty disputes

First

Last

News & Publications

Publications Search

Latest Publications

Ukraine v Russia in the English Courts – The Public Policy Exception to the Foreign Act of State Doctrine

The Serious Fraud Office, Legal Privilege and The Production of Documents – Recent Developments

Court of Appeal Permits Discontinuance of Proceedings to Enforce Foreign Award Against Kazakhstan

International Court of Justice Hears Chagos Islands Case

Romania Ordered to Pay Security for Stay of Proceedings to Enforce ICSID Award

Court of Appeal Confirms Customary International Law Rule on Immunity of Members of a “Special Mission”

State Immunity – Enforcement Of Awards Before The English Courts – Update

Breaking News: ICJ Orders Provisional Measures In Qatar V United Arab Emirates

Newsweek Cover Story 14th July 2018 - Law in Action- Khawar Qureshi QC on life as a Leading U.K. Queen's Counsel and the 'Jadhav' spy case

Recent English Court Decisions Concerning Anti-Suit Injunctions

Recent English Court Decisions Concerning Freezing Orders

Will Boris Becker's "Diplomatic Immunity" Ace legal claims in London? -Khawar Qureshi QC's article in the UK Times 20th June 2018

ICJ proceedings instituted by Qatar against the United Arab Emirates on 11th June 2018

US withdraws from Iran deal

Case Update - Judicial/Arbitrator bias and conflicts of interest

English Commercial Court Finds Bit Tribunal Interpreted its Jurisdiction Wrongly in Investor-State Dispute